Information page, Video
Seats marked with x COVID

The case of Denmark: monitoring human rights during COVID-19

The COVID-19 measures that were introduced in Denmark in March 2020 were very intrusive for human rights and all citizens in Denmark. Were they necessary? And were they within the limits of human rights obligations in Denmark? Learn more about human rights monitoring in a state of emergency with this case study.

1.  Monitoring in Denmark during COVID-19

In the video below, head of the monitoring department Christoffer Badse will discuss monitoring human rights during the COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark. The presentation will focus on the rapid drafting of a monitoring report conducted by DIHR together with the Danish Bar and Lawyers association.  

By pressing play you accept cookies and tracking from the external video-provider.

2.  Our recommendations in the report

Christoffer Badse outlines the main conclusions and recommendations of the report drafted by DIHR and the Danish Bar and Lawyers association in March 2020. The recommendations include but are not limited to the principles of necessity, proportionality, transparency, and time limitation. The report also includes more abstract recommendations aimed at the political level.  

By pressing play you accept cookies and tracking from the external video-provider.

For those interested, an English summary of the report can be found here.  

3.  How was the report received?  

How was the report received by politicians, civil servants, and other state actors? In this final video, Christoffer Badse discusses the reception of the report on COVID-19 actions in Denmark and illustrates how NHRIs work with state actors to protect and fulfil human rights obligations.  

By pressing play you accept cookies and tracking from the external video-provider.

Context update: In the new adopted Danish Act on Epidemics, the following improvements are in alignment with the Danish Institute for Human Rights recommendations, namely parliamentary control with certain administrative regulations, and transparency and openness in relation to the recommendations on initiatives of preventing epidemics issued by the Commission of Epidemics.